Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Biofilm-Producing Nosocomial Non-Coagulase Staphylococcus Isolates from Clinical Sources in Iraq

All published articles of this journal are available on ScienceDirect.

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Biofilm-Producing Nosocomial Non-Coagulase Staphylococcus Isolates from Clinical Sources in Iraq

The Open Microbiology Journal 16 May 2025 RESEARCH ARTICLE DOI: 10.2174/0118742858386805250425074030

Abstract

Background and Aims

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are commonly found on the skin and mucous membranes of humans and animals. Many of them, such as Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, and Staphylococcus petrasii, are significant causes of various diseases. Staphylococcus spp. is typically a commensal microorganism that can exist in the human body and often does not cause any illness. A bacterium possessing virulence factors, such as biofilm formation, is significant because these factors enhance its ability to cause disease. As biofilms shield bacteria from opsonophagocytosis and antimicrobial agents, they can cause persistent or chronic infections. This study aimed to examine biofilm formation in coagulase-negative Staphylococcus as a strategy to prevent and manage infection, thereby supporting public health maintenance and improvement. It focused on characterizing local S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus isolates using molecular techniques, particularly multilocus sequence typing (MLST), with the goal of advancing epidemiological understanding and surveillance efforts.

Methods

In this study, samples were collected, and the species were identified using the VITEK 2 Compact system. A Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion test was carried out to detect antimicrobial susceptibility, and the biofilm production was tested with a microtiter plate. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed, followed by data processing using the Oxford scheme to categorize the isolates.

Results

The isolates included 13.3% (n=20) S.epidermidis, 20% (n=30) S. haemolyticus, 23.3% (n=35) coagulase-positive staphylococci, 26% (n=39) Gram-negative bacteria, and 17.3% (n=26) showed no growth. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) isolates exhibited 100% resistance to amoxiclav, cefoxitin, methicillin, amoxicillin, and ceftriaxone. High resistance was observed against piperacillin (96%), ceftazidime (96%), fusidic acid (76%), tobramycin (68%), tetracycline (68%), gentamicin (66%), and azithromycin (66%). Moderate resistance was noted for vancomycin (52%), clindamycin (46%), lincomycin (42%), ciprofloxacin (42%), and levofloxacin (40%). Lower resistance rates were recorded for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (38%), rifampicin (38%), nitrofurantoin (18%), meropenem (10%), and chloramphenicol (2%). Notably, 76% of isolates were classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR). Biofilm formation was observed in 100% of isolates, with 58% showing strong, 30% moderate, and 12% weak biofilm production. MLST analysis revealed genetic diversity among local S. epidermidis and S. hemolyticus isolates, identifying several sequence types (STs), including STs (23, 59, 89, 35, 1183) for S. epidermidis and STs (24, 35, 109, 173, 146) for S. hemolyticus, some of which were reported for the first time in Iraq.

Conclusion

This study offers significant insights into the prevalence, antibiotic resistance patterns, and genotypic variation of S.epidermidis and S.haemolyticus strains in Anbar, Iraq. Additionally, it identifies several strains with novel MLST data, marking the first instance of such findings in Iraq, including strain S.epidermidis with IDs (46590, 46588, 46587, 46591, 46592) and S.haemolyticus with IDs (240, 241, 242, 243, 244).

Keywords: S.haemolyticus, S.epidermidis, MLST, MDR, Biofilm.

1. INTRODUCTION

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), including Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus, are commonly present on the skin and mucous membranes of humans and animals [1].

They are acknowledged as opportunistic pathogens, with Staphylococcus epidermidis being the primary coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) responsible for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) [2]. HAIs, previously known as nosocomial or hospital-acquired infections, are infections acquired by patients during medical treatment in healthcare settings. They are a major contributor to illness and death among hospitalized patients [3]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 7% of hospitalized patients in developed countries and 10% in developing countries are estimated to acquire at least one healthcare-associated infection (HAI) at any given time [4]. CoNS are primarily recognized as commensals on human and animal bodies, but they can also act as opportunistic pathogens. The composition of commensal skin flora varies by body site, reflecting the differing environmental conditions at each location [5]. It is noteworthy that biofilm-associated infections resist responding to different antimicrobial agents, the immune system, as well as harsh conditions; thus, biofilm formation is an important characteristic in the progression of pathogenicity. Biofilm-forming isolates contribute to infections associated with catheters and other medical equipment [6]. Biofilm-producing S. haemolyticus is a major cause of bacteremia, particularly in catheter-associated and nosocomial infections. Biofilm formation by S. haemolyticus is a complex process that is further enhanced in the presence of antimicrobial agents [7]. These biofilm-producing CoNS are increasingly reported to be resistant to “methicillin” and various antibiotic classes, including lincosamides and macrolides. This growing resistance poses a significant challenge in treating clinical infections, complicating antibiotic selection for patient care [8]. The most commonly isolated MR-CoNS species in hospitals are S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus [9].

MLST is a molecular typing technique employed for bacteria identification and classification. It relies on analyzing DNA sequences from seven highly conserved housekeeping genes essential for cellular function [10]. These gene sequences are amplified via PCR and then compared against a reference database of known MLST types, allowing for the identification and assignment of the isolate to an MLST type. This classification offers insights into the bacterium's genetic lineage and potential pathogenicity [11]. This study aimed to identify prevalent local isolates and distinguish infectious pathogen strains using MLST to enhance epidemiological surveillance and strain source determination. Additionally, it investigated biofilm formation and antibiotic susceptibility patterns in Staphylococcus isolates. Given its role as a significant human pathogen, particularly in immunocompromised individuals, long-term hospitalized patients, and those with severe illnesses, understanding its genetic diversity and resistance profiles is crucial for effective infection control.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Bacterial Sampling and Identification

Between December 2022 and June 2023, a total of 150 clinical samples were collected, including wounds, burns, urine, ear swabs, and blood samples. Staphylococcus isolates were identified based on their growth on blood agar and mannitol salt agar. Characterization was carried out using conventional microbiological methods, including colonial morphology, Gram staining, and biochemical tests. Final identification was conducted using the VITEK 2 Compact system (bioMérieux, France), following the bacterial identification protocol cited previously [10].

2.2. Detection of Antibiotic Resistance Profile

The Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method used 19 antibiotic discs (“Oxoid, UK”). The antibiotic susceptibility of the isolates was tested against a range of antibiotics, including amoxiclav, cefoxitin, methicillin, amoxicillin, ceftriaxone, piperacillin, ceftazidime, fusidic acid, tobramycin, tetracycline, gentamicin, azithromycin, vancomycin, clindamycin, lincomycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, rifampicin, nitrofurantoin, meropenem, and chloramphenicol.

2.3. Biofilm Formation

Biofilm production was assessed using the microtiter plate method, as described by Yousefi et al. (2016).

2.4. Molecular Screening of mecA Gene

Bacterial DNA was extracted using the Promega DNA Mini Kit provided by Promega, USA. DNA was extracted from the bacteria, and its purity was measured. A specific gene, mecA, was then tested for forward “(5′-TCCAGATTACAACTTCACCAGG-3′)” and reverse “(5′-CCACTTCATATCTTGTAACG-3′)” primers, following the method described by Ghaznavi-Rad et al. The PCR mixture (20 µL total volume) included 10 µL master mix (Thermo Scientific, USA), 0.5 µL of each 10 µM primer, 1 µL DNA template, and 8 µL nuclease-free water. The PCR was carried out on a Bio-Rad MyCycler™ (USA) with the following settings: initial denaturation at 98°C for 30 seconds, 28 cycles of denaturation (98°C for 10 seconds), annealing (52°C for 30 seconds), and extension (72°C for 30 seconds), followed by a final extension at 72°C for (5 minutes) and a hold at 4°C. PCR products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis at 58 V for 120 minutes on a 1.4% agarose gel containing 0.5 µL gel stain (Bioteke, China). A 100 bp DNA ladder (Vivantis, Malaysia) served as a marker. The gel was visualized under UV light and imaged using a gel imager (Major Science, USA) [12].

2.5. Multilocus Sequence Typing

All strains were analyzed by the MLST protocol using primers listed in Tables 1 and 2. All PCR reactions were carried out in Applied Biosystems 2720 Thermal Cycler (USA).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using a chi-square test to determine whether the distribution of resistance percentages varies for each antibiotic, along with the relationship between the source of isolate and biofilm formation.

2.7. Ethical Approval

The study obtained approval from the Ethics Committee of Al Anbar Medical Research University (approval number 23, December 5th, 2022). All participants provided consent, and no individuals under 16 years old were involved.

Table 1.
Genes and primer sequence for Staphylococcus haemolyticus used in the MLST scheme [13].
Amplicon Size Primer Sequence (5-3) Gene Loci
600 F AGTGACTCAAGTTGAA
R AATCTTACCATCTAGG
Arca
540 F CGGTAATGTAACACACGCAGT
R TCTTCCTAGTAGCTGACCAG
SH 1200b
500 F CTGATCGTCAAGCTGAAGCAT
R GTACCTGTGTGACCCTCAGA
HemHC
650 F AGCCATAGATTCGCATGGTGT
R CCTAATGAACCTGGAATGGTAG
leuBd
600 F TCAGACCAATTCCCAACC
R CTTTAGCGTCACGATGGTCG
SH 1431e
500 F GAAGCACAAATTGATGGTCTGC
R TCTGCCCCATTATCAACACA
CfxE f
650 F GAGACGATTCAGCTAAGCAA
R CGCCTTTCATTAGGCCATTA
Ribose ABC
Table 2.
Genes and primer sequence for Staphylococcus epidermidis used in the MLST scheme [14].
Gene Primer sequence (5′–3′) Amplicon (bp)
arcC F TGTGATGAGCACGCTACCGTTAG
R TCCAAGTAAACCCATCGGTCTG
508
aroE F CATTGGATTACCTCTTTGTTCAGC
“R CAAGCGAAATCTGTTGGGG”
459
gtr “F CAGCCAATTCTTTTATGACTTTT”
“R GTGATTAAAGGTATTGATTTGAAT”
508
mutS F GATATAAGAATAAGGGTTGTGAA
R GTAATCGTCTCAGTTATCATGTT
608
pyr F GTTACTAATACTTTTGCTGTGTTT
R GTAGAATGTAAAGAGACTAAAATGAA
851
Tpi F ATCCAATTAGACGCTTTAGTAAC
R TTAATGATGCGCCACCTACA
592
yqiL F CACGCATAGTATTAGCTGAAG
R CTAATGCCTTCATCTTGAGAAATAA
658

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Phenotypic Identification of Clinical Isolates

In the period from December 2022 to June 2023, 150 samples were collected from clinical sources, including patients of both sexes from different teaching hospitals and outpatients in Anbar/Iraq. All these samples were grown on mannitol salt agar and blood agar. The bacterial isolates included were 13.3% (n=20) S. epidermidis, 20% (n=30) S. haemolyticus, 23.3% (n=35) coagulase-positive staphylococci, 26% (n=39) Gram-negative bacteria, and 17.3% (n=26) showed no growth. Higher prevalence rates of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRCoNS) have been reported in South Africa, reporting 86% in one study [14] and 100% in another study [15]. Among CoNS associated with infections, S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus are recognized as significant etiological agents causing nosocomial infections [16]. Notably, S. epidermidis is the most frequently isolated staphylococcal species in humans and is considered the most clinically relevant CoNS species [17]. The highest percentage of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) was isolated from wound samples (36%), followed by burn samples (20%) and urine samples (18%). The lowest percentages were observed in ear swabs and blood samples, with 14% and 12%, respectively.

3.2. Antibiotic Sensitivity of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus

The antibiotic susceptibility testing of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) isolates showed the highest resistance rates to amoxiclav, cefoxitin, methicillin, amoxicillin, and ceftriaxone (100%). The isolates also exhibited high resistance to piperacillin (96%), ceftazidime (96%), fusidic acid (76%), tobramycin (68%), tetracycline (68%), gentamicin (66%), and azithromycin (66%). Resistance to vancomycin was observed in 52% of the isolates. Resistance levels were low against clindamycin (46%), lincomycin (42%), ciprofloxacin (42%), levofloxacin (40%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (38%), rifampicin (38%), and nitrofurantoin (18%). In comparison, the lowest resistance was observed against meropenem (10%) and chloramphenicol (2%). The results also confirmed that the study isolates were considered multidrug-resistant (MDR), with 76% showing resistance to six classes of antibiotics: penicillin, cephalosporins, macrolides, glycopeptides, tetracyclines, and fluoroquinolones.

An isolate is considered MDR when it shows resistance to at least three classes of antibiotic agents [18]. This virulent characteristic, i.e., its ability to resist multiple classes of antibiotics simultaneously, makes the bacterium one of the most intractable pathogens in the history of antibiotics [19]. MDR Staphylococcus can resist various agents through multiple mechanisms, such as altering the target site, producing deactivating enzymes, efflux pumping, and decreasing the intracellular concentration of antibiotics [20]. These mechanisms often arise due to prolonged or improper antibiotic use by patients [21]. This study revealed that meropenem is a highly effective antibiotic against multidrug-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Meropenem acts on the cell wall like other beta-lactam antibiotics but differs in its high resistance to cephalosporinase or beta-lactamase enzymes [22].

However, chloramphenicol is the most effective antibiotic, exhibiting the highest efficacy. It is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that exerts its antibacterial effects by inhibiting bacterial protein synthesis at the ribosomal level. Its primary mechanism of action involves binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit, specifically at the peptidyl transferase center, to prevent the formation of peptide bonds between amino acids during translation, effectively halting polypeptide chain elongation. This inhibition disrupts bacterial protein synthesis, ultimately leading to bacteriostatic effects against most susceptible organisms [23]. The high susceptibilities recorded against these antibiotics could be due to the reserved use of those antibiotics, mainly for resistant staphylococcal infections. Thus, last-resort antibiotics still retain high activity against coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) and may be used for empirical treatment of conditions, such as suspected CoNS sepsis, even though resistance to these antibiotics is gradually increasing [24]. The results showed that all isolates (100%) were methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. There was a complete concordance between phenotypic and genotypic results in confirming methicillin resistance in this study. This is primarily due to the presence of the mecA gene, which encodes the PBP2a protein that has a low affinity for beta-lactam antibiotics [25].

3.3. Biofilm Formation

The results of the microtiter plate (MTP) assay revealed that all the isolates demonstrated a positive ability for biofilm formation. Based on their biofilm-producing capacity, the isolates were classified into three categories: 58% (n=29) exhibited strong biofilm formation, 30% (n=15) displayed moderate biofilm production, and 12% (n=6) showed weak biofilm formation. These findings highlight the varying degrees of biofilm production among the isolates, which may have implications for their pathogenicity and persistence in clinical settings. Statistical analysis was performed to determine which clinical source was associated with the highest level of biofilm production and whether the observed differences were statistically significant. The results indicated that coagulase-negative Staphylococcus isolates from urine and wound sources exhibited significantly higher biofilm production compared to isolates from blood and ear swabs. Although biofilm production in burn isolates was higher than in those from blood and ear swab samples, the difference was not statistically significant (Table 3).

Isolates of Staphylococcus haemolyticus from urine and wound samples showed significantly higher biofilm production than isolates from blood and ear swabs. Burn isolates demonstrated elevated biofilm levels but without statistical significance. This suggests that specific clinical

Table 3.
Presents a statistically significant difference in biofilm production among different sources (p < 0.05).
Comparison P-value Significance (p < 0.05)
Urine vs. Blood < 0.01 Significant
Wound vs. Blood < 0.01 Significant
Burn vs. Blood 0.07 Not Significant
Ear Swab vs. Blood 0.08 Not Significant
Urine vs. Wound 0.90 Not Significant
Urine vs. Burn 0.04 Significant

environments may favor biofilm formation due to nutrient availability or local stress factors. Another study indicated that biofilm production was most prevalent in blood samples (27.3%), followed by pus swabs (12.5%) and pus aspirates (16.7%). Biofilm development is strongly associated with medical device-related infections, including contaminated implants, urinary catheters, and prosthetic valves [26]. Biofilm is an extracellular polysaccharide layer that facilitates bacterial attachment to surfaces and medical devices. S. haemolyticus isolates capable of forming biofilms contribute to infections associated with catheters and other medical devices [7]. S. epidermidis-producing biofilms can lead to bacteremia, especially in cases linked to catheter-associated and nosocomial infections. Biofilm formation by S. haemolyticus is a complex process that becomes more pronounced in the presence of antimicrobial agents [27].

3.4. Molecular Screening of mecA Gene

The results demonstrated that all the isolates were 100% positive for the detection of the mecA gene in methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus isolates by using Uniplex PCR. Methicillin resistance occurs mainly because of a mutation in chromosome-encoded protein (penicillin-binding protein); bacteriophage transfers this mutation among CoNS isolates [28]. Methicillin-resistant strains have always exhibited a wide number of virulence factors and consequently show multi-drug resistance through different mechanisms [29]. In this study, the MRCoNS strains showed 100% multi-drug resistance, which is in agreement with the findings of a previous study [30].

The highest resistance rate of CoNS toward amoxiclav, cefoxitin, methicillin, amoxicillin, and ceftriaxone was observed. Methicillin resistance in isolates that lack the mecA gene may be mediated by other mechanisms of methicillin resistance, such as the presence of mecC and mecB genes [31]. The overproduction of β-lactamases, along with the emergence of methicillin resistance, has been documented in approximately 80% of CoNS species. This high prevalence significantly contributes to increased morbidity and mortality in hospital settings, as CoNS are major pathogens in healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) [24].

3.5. MLST Analysis

The molecular analysis identified five distinct sequence types (STs) of Staphylococcus epidermidis, demonstrating a high level of genotypic diversity. Notably, all isolates were recorded in Iraq for the first time, as presented in Table 4 and Fig. (1). ST89 was initially reported in Denmark in 1997 with ID 40259, with a global frequency of 27 isolates. In the current study, this ST has been

Fig. (1). Shows the percentage distribution of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates across Asia, highlighting regional variations. Notably, Iraq shows a significant proportion, possibly due to hospital-acquired infections, antimicrobial resistance, or diagnostic differences.

identified in Iraq with ID 46590. Similarly, ST23 was first recorded in Mexico in 1996 with ID 40147 and has now been documented in Iraq with ID 46588. ST59 was originally detected in South Korea with ID 41234, and in this study, it has been identified in Iraq with ID 46587. This sequence type exhibited the highest frequency in this study, with a global occurrence of 101 isolates. Additionally, ST1183 was found to have the lowest global frequency, with only three recorded strains. These findings highlight the genetic diversity of S. epidermidis isolates and emphasize the importance of continued molecular surveillance to understand the epidemiology and distribution of this opportunistic pathogen. Moreover, there is a need for targeted public health measures and further research in Iraq. The Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolates analyzed in this study provide valuable insights into their global distribution and epidemiological significance. Sequence type (ST) 24 was first recorded in India in 2010 with ID 55, while in the current study, this isolate was identified in Iraq with ID 240. Similarly, ST35 was initially reported in India in 2016 with ID 70 and has now been detected in Iraq with ID 241. ST109 was first identified in China in 2019 with ID 151, and in the present study, it has been recorded in Iraq with ID 242, with a frequency of two isolates. ST173 was initially reported in Burma in 2023 with ID 238 and has now been recorded in Iraq with ID 243. Likewise, ST146 was first documented in Thailand in 2021 with ID 197, and in the current study, this isolate has been detected in Iraq with ID 244. Other details of ST under study are listed in Table 4 and Fig. (2).

Fig. (2). Shows the percentage distribution of Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolates across Asia, highlighting their prevalence in various countries. The green section represents the isolates recorded in Iraq, specifically in Ramadi, from the current study. This image presents a comparative analysis of the geographical spread of S. haemolyticus, emphasizing the newly identified isolates in Iraq and their contribution to the regional distribution.
Table 4.
Presents data on Staphylococcus epidermidis (1–5) and Staphylococcus haemolyticus (6–10) isolates, detailing their sequence types (STs), ID profiles, geographic origin, isolation sources, year of first global identification, study-specific identification numbers, and frequency of occurrence.
Isolates ST Methicillin Susceptibility ID Profile Isolation Area First Time Source of Isolation First Isolation Year in the World Special ID for the Current Study Frequency
1. 89 *MRSE 40259 Denmark blood 1997 46590 27 isolates
2. 23 MRSE 40147 Mexico Blood 1996 46588 60 isolates
3. 59 MRSE 41234 South Korea Wound swab 2000 46587 101 isolates
4. 1183 MRSE 44665 South Africa CSF 46591 3 isolates
5. 35 MRSE 40165 Portugal Nasal swab 2000 46592 22 isolates
6. 24 *MRSH 55 India Wound 2010 240 2 isolates
7. 35 MRSH 70 India Wound 2016 241 2 isolates
8. 109 MRSH 151 China UTI 2019 242 2 isolates
9. 173 MRSH 238 Burma Wound 2023 243 2 isolates
10. 146 MRSH 197 Thailand Wound 2021 244 2 isolates
*MSRE: Methicillin Resistance S. epidermidis, *MSRH: Methicillin Resistance S. haemolyticus

Alleles and sequence types (STs) were identified using the S. epidermidis-specific MLST database (https: //pubmlst. org/bigsdb?db =pubmlst_ sepidermidis _isolates& page=profiles &scheme _id=4) and for S. haemolyticus isolate, using its corresponding MLST database https: //pubmlst. org/bigsdb ?db=pubmlst _shaemolyticus _isolates &page= profiles &scheme _id=1).

The detection of various sequence types (STs) in Iraq suggests possible intercontinental transmission or convergent evolution, potentially driven by selective pressures in hospital environments. ST89 (from Denmark), ST23 (from Mexico), and the rare ST1183 indicate global dissemination and the importance of monitoring uncommon STs for antimicrobial resistance. For Staphylococcus haemolyticus, five distinct STs were identified, namely ST24 and ST35 (from India), ST109 (from China), ST173 (from Burma), and ST146 (from Thailand), indicating regional spread within Asia and broader international movement. This underscores the genetic diversity and global distribution of these pathogens. The emergence of these sequence types in Iraq may result from globalization, hospital transmission, and antimicrobial selective pressures [32]. The presence of globally distributed STs in S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus suggests that healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) influence their population structure. As major opportunistic pathogens linked to bloodstream and prosthetic device infections with multidrug resistance, molecular surveillance is essential [33]. The detection of sequence types with varying global frequencies in Iraq highlights the need for continuous genetic monitoring to track bacterial evolution, antimicrobial resistance, and transmission pathways. Using MLST databases enabled precise classification and epidemiological assessment. Identifying both novel and known S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus STs reveals their genetic diversity and clinical significance. Ongoing molecular surveillance is crucial to understand their distribution, resistance profiles, and pathogenic potential, supporting effective infection control strategies [34]. Another study indicated that MLST analysis of S. epidermidis identifies high-risk clones linked to nosocomial infections, tracks antibiotic-resistant strains, and guides infection control and antibiotic therapy. It enhances understanding of S. epidermidis epidemiology, supporting strategies to prevent and manage infections [35].

CONCLUSION

This study reveals high methicillin resistance, multidrug resistance (MDR), and strong biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolates from Anbar, Iraq. The identification of diverse sequence types (STs), reported for the first time in Iraq, highlights their genetic diversity and potential for intercontinental transmission. The presence of the mecA gene in all MRCoNS underscores the antimicrobial resistance threat. These findings emphasize the need for continuous molecular surveillance to track bacterial evolution and resistance, supporting effective infection control strategies and antibiotic stewardship in healthcare settings.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

It is hereby acknowledged that all authors have accepted responsibility for the manuscript's content and consented to its submission. They have meticulously reviewed all results and unanimously approved the final version of the manuscript.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

This study obtained approval from the Ethics Committee of Al Anbar Medical Research University (approval number 23, December 5th, 2022).

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional and/or research committee and with the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 2013.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

STANDARDS OF REPORTING

STROBE guidelines were followed.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

1
Becker K, Heilmann C, Peters G. Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 2014; 27(4): 870-926.
2
Al-kubaisy SHM, Khalaf BH, Khaleef EL. Nosocomial infections: Types and prevalence. J Univ Anbar Pure Sci 2022; 16(2): 1-6.
3
Marsteller JA, Hsu YJ, Weeks K. Evaluating the impact of mandatory public reporting on participation and performance in a program to reduce central line–associated bloodstream infections: Evidence from a national patient safety collaborative. Am J Infect Control 2014; 42(10): S209-15.
4
Katoziyan A, Imani Fooladi AA, Taheri RA, Vatanpour S. “Multi-drug resistance of staphylococcus aureus strains in baqiyatallah hospital: A primary step towards digital health biomonitoring systems,” Iran. Iran J Pharm Res 2020; 19(3): 321-8.
5
Myles IA, Moore IN, Castillo CR, Datta SK. Differing virulence of healthy skin commensals in mouse models of infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2019; 8: 451.
6
Flahaut S, Vinogradov E, Kelley KA, Brennan S, Hiramatsu K, Lee JC. Structural and biological characterization of a capsular polysaccharide produced by Staphylococcus haemolyticus. J Bacteriol 2008; 190(5): 1649-57.
7
Pereira-Ribeiro PMA, Sued-Karam BR, Faria YV, et al. Influence of antibiotics on biofilm formation by different clones of nosocomial Staphylococcus haemolyticus. Future Microbiol 2019; 14(9): 789-99.
8
Wojtyczka R, Orlewska K, Kępa M, et al. Biofilm formation and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains from a hospital environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014; 11(5): 4619-33.
9
Mehdinejad M, Sheikh AF, Jolodar A. Study of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and species of coagulase negative staphylococci isolated from various clinical specimens. Pak J Med Sci 2008; 24(5): 719-24.
10
Lahij HF, Almeani SAL. Multidrug-resistant clinical K. pneumoniae ST16, ST218, and ST283 and emergence of pandrug-resistant KPC-positive ST6434/K2 lineage in Iraq. Braz J Microbiol 2024; 55(1): 375-82.
11
Weng PL, Ramli R, Shamsudin MN, Cheah Y-K, Hamat RA. High genetic diversity of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis clinical isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence typing from a hospital in Malaysia. Biomed Res Int 2013; 2013: 938937.
12
Martínez-Santos VI, Torres-Añorve DA, Echániz-Aviles G, Parra-Rojas I, Ramírez-Peralta A, Castro-Alarcón N. Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates from hospitalized patients with bloodstream infection obtained in two time periods. PeerJ 2022; 10: 14030.
13
Maiden M C J, et al. MLST revisited: The gene-by-gene approach to bacterial genomics. Nat Rev Microbiol 2013; 11(10): 728-36.
14
Ballot DE, Nana T, Sriruttan C, Cooper PA. Bacterial bloodstream infections in neonates in a developing country. ISRN Pediatr 2012; 2012(1): 1-6.
15
Ehlers MM, Strasheim W, Lowe M, Ueckermann V, Kock MM. Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus epidermidis implicated in catheter-related bloodstream infections at an Academic Hospital in Pretoria, South Africa. Front Microbiol 2018; 9: 417.
16
Gómez-Sanz E, Ceballos S, Ruiz-Ripa L, Zarazaga M, Torres C. Clonally diverse methicillin and multidrug resistant coagulase negative staphylococci are ubiquitous and pose transfer ability between pets and their owners. Front Microbiol 2019; 10: 485.
17
Namvar AE, Bastarahang S, Abbasi N, et al. Clinical characteristics of Staphylococcus epidermidis: A systematic review. GMS Hyg Infect Control 2014; 9(3): Doc23.
18
Turner NA, Sharma-Kuinkel BK, Maskarinec SA, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An overview of basic and clinical research. Nat Rev Microbiol 2019; 17(4): 203-18.
19
Suganya T, Packiavathy IASV, Aseervatham GSB, et al. Tackling multiple-drug-resistant bacteria with conventional and complex phytochemicals. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022; 12: 883839.
20
Rajput P, Nahar KS, Rahman KM. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance mechanisms in gram-positive bacteria. Antibiotics 2024; 13(12): 1197.
21
Mukherjee R, Priyadarshini A, Pandey RP, Raj VS. Antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Staphylococcus Aureus 2021; 1-7.
22
Alfei S, Schito AM. β-lactam antibiotics and β-lactamase enzymes inhibitors, part 2: Our limited resources. Pharmaceuticals 2022; 15(4): 476.
23
Yu T, Zeng F. Chloramphenicol interferes with 50s ribosomal subunit maturation via direct and indirect mechanisms. Biomolecules 2024; 14(10): 1225.
24
Asante J, Amoako DG, Abia ALK, et al. Review of clinically and epidemiologically relevant coagulase-negative staphylococci in Africa. Microb Drug Resist 2020; 26(8): 951-70.
25
Lade H, Kim JS. Molecular determinants of β-lactam resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): An updated review. Antibiotics 2023; 12(9): 1362.
26
Dilip DS, Menon AR. Speciation, detection of virulence factors and antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase negative staphylococci. Int J Sci Res Dent Med Sci 2021; 3(3): 122-32.
27
Dier-Pereira AP, et al. “Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus haemolyticus displaying reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and high biofilm-forming ability,” Infect. Disord. TargetsDisorders 2021; 21(7): e160921191517.
28
Lakhundi S, Zhang K. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular characterization, evolution, and epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev 2018; 31(4): e00020-18.
29
Algammal AM, Hetta HF, Elkelish A, et al. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): One health perspective approach to the bacterium epidemiology, virulence factors, antibiotic-resistance, and zoonotic impact. Infect Drug Resist 2020; 13: 3255-65.
30
Adhikari P, Basyal D, Rai JR, et al. Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and multidrug resistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical samples at a tertiary care teaching hospital: An observational, cross-sectional study from the Himalayan country, Nepal. BMJ Open 2023; 13(5): 067384.
31
Dhaouadi S, Soufi L, Campanile F, et al. Prevalence of meticillin-resistant and -susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci with the first detection of the mecC gene among cows, humans and manure in Tunisia. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020; 55(1): 105826.
32
Berndtson AE. Increasing globalization and the movement of antimicrobial resistance between countries. Surg Infect 2020; 21(7): 579-85.
33
Chong J. Molecular epidemiology and clinical impact of heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate coagulase negative staphylococci in the NICU 2016; 1-8.
34
Ogunlaja A, Oginni O. Molecular epidemiology and phylodynamics of emerging and re-emerging viral infections: Implications for surveillance and control. Inter J Res Publicat Rev 2022; 6(2): 2924-41.
35
Jamet A, Guglielmini J, Brancotte B, et al. High-resolution typing of Staphylococcus epidermidis based on core genome multilocus sequence typing to investigate the hospital spread of multidrug-resistant clones. J Clin Microbiol 2021; 59(3): e02454-20.